Constitutional Rights

The organisation of the United States, or Bill of Rights, was developed to encourage individuals by enforcing certain laws throughout the land and is bound under the federal government and each state. The accountabilitys of individuals expand out to businesses, employees, and consumers. This content will discuss two specific inbuilt rights that whitethorn impact the employees of Huffman Trucking. Huffman Trucking will be doing an analysis of the search and seizure, solitude, and employee drug testing policies within the organization and determine if the stallion rights of his or her employees are being violated. If Huffman Trucking is in irreverence of the constitutional rights of their employees, the company can and will be held criminally liable. Search and SeizureThe Federal Motor Carrier Safety judiciary (FMCSA) has been interested in the ?smart card? technology in order to be used for Hours of Service (HOS) compliance of go motortruck drivers. All driv ers would each have an electronic onboard record-keeper (EOBR) relate to a global positioning satellite (GPS) system. The EOBR would be installed on most trucks for the purpose of monitoring and enforcing compliance HOS regulations. This is desired by the FMCSA because this system would cut down or scorn the falsifying of HOS. Furthermore, this data would be available for anyone who enforces HOS regulations such as the owner, carrier, or law enforcement officer (OOIDA, 2006). The real-time electronic direction system, proposed by the government agency FMSCA, is close to the area of get into on the Huffman driver?s right of privacy. The Fourth Amendment grants persons the right to be ?secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, and no warrants shall issue, moreover upon seeming cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and in particular describing the institutionalize to be searched, and the persons or things to be...
This move is based on a fundamental flaw. The Constitution does non guarantee privacy on anything approaching the scope that the writer suggests. Specifically, there is no constitutional protection against surveillance of something that is in obvious view, and a truck on the highway is considered to be (duh) in plain view. part drug testing may be obnoxious, and is imperfect, it is not unconstitutional. This essay needs to be reworked entirely. As to drug testing, if a hugger-mugger employer wants to do drug testing, the courts have consistently held that this i s not a governmental program, so that it is not illegal and the Constitution has no bearing on the issue. If you want to get a proficient essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay